Research and Practice in Education - Still too far?!?


The ‘bridge too far’ that Bruer preconized more than two decades ago (1997) still finds echo in today’s discussions. Is it applicable? Haven’t we crossed the bridge of responsible transdisciplinarity and translational research to application yet? Recent publications seem to contradict this. Let’s then examine why. Daniel (2012) states that “If we are truly interested in pursuing educational implications, it is important to understand that what works in a controlled context may have a very different effect when applied without the support inherent to high-quality curricular design” (2012, p. 252). By controlled context here, the intended meaning is the lab, where variables are carefully controlled to measure intended (or not) outcomes. To all intents and purposes, the idea that Daniel gives is that there should be controlled and well aligned experiments in the lab before they are translated into educational guidelines to improve learning in real classrooms. So far, so good. It is, after all, an informed opinion from an exponent of his area (Neuroscience) that is concerned about how untrained professionals (teachers) will consume and use neuroscientific data.

Photo on <a href="https://foter.com/">Foter.com</a>
But when is concern for responsible use stretched further into impossibility of use? When Daniel (2012) questions Roediger and Pyc’s (2012) recommendations as in “For example, several of the reviewed techniques are useful for fact learning, which is important. But how do we encourage the more flexible and conceptual learning that characterizes the goals of many educators?” (Daniel, 2012, p. 252), it seems to me that  the step given in the right direction– reviewed techniques for fact learning – was not enough, and even more, discouraged as such. Why? When has a step ahead – in the right direction – been considered a discouragement?

There needs to be a practical use for everything that is investigated under the umbrella of educational purposes in a lab. When a first step is given – even a successful one - it is demanded instead that the whole road ahead should be mapped. What is then the purpose of research?

When one step ahead is not celebrated for its courage and usefulness, then something must be very wrong with the whole idea of progress. It is unreal to expect every single finding, no matter how replicated and refutable it might be in the lab, to go through exhaustive testing in controlled settings for a single and very important fact – learners are not lab rats. Not in the literal let alone in the figurative sense. There is always a variable that will be unaccounted for in every single learning setting. And this is because not only learners learn in different ways, but the unique combination of their learning endeavors will be a unique and irreproducible experience every single turn. After all, this is the way our brains are wired to operate.
What's you take on that? Do you think that there is a possible (and feasible) bridge between research and practice in Education?

References

Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational researcher, 26(8), 4-16.

Daniel, D. B. (2012). Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 251-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.004

Roediger, H. I., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Memorizing what you want to learn

Image
How to better memorize what you want to learn? Photo credit: Foter.com I subscribe to what William James once said “It is our attitude at the beginning of a task which, more than anything else, will determine its outcome.”  But positive attitude cannot counteract the substantive small amount of short term memory we have (Miller, 1956). So, I respect my cognitive load (De Jong, 2010) and take the time I need to absorb the material given. I explore it in my own time (be it more or less than the average) by breaking the content into small, manageable chunks that I can better manipulate in my working memory while I strengthen, through revision and repetition, the synapses I already had or create new ones that encode new memories (Vanderbilt, 2014). Once content is in my ‘hands’ I apply different strategies: cognitive, memory, compensation, communication, metacognitive, affective and social (Oxford and Crookall, 1989). Moreover, I do lots of testing: quizzes, retelling, wri
Read more

A culture of teaching

Image
Is there a culture of teaching? How do you know? Photo credit: followthethings.com via Foter.com / CC BY-NC-SA I’m a member of the culture of teaching. At least, I thought I was... and as such, I still vouch for the principles of openness, reciprocity, care and improvement. To me, being part of that culture meant that, notwithstanding the place one would come from, the language, beliefs, ideas and principles shared would unite and turn our practices into common ground for understanding and application. But, in a recent event I attended, 20 practitioners from all over the world came together to a country that was not native to any of them. That country provided us with the language and the services to be propagated by us in our respective countries. In the morning, we would attend the presentations and subsequently had to deliver parts of it as training for what we would do once back in our places of residence. At first I thought that our shared knowledge of the subje
Read more

Have you ever thought about Numeracy? How does it differ from Literacy?

Image
     Photo on <a href="https://foter.com/re2/8ec163" >Foter.com The first time that I vividly remember reflecting on the importance of numeracy more recently was when I read an account of how some industry tycoons learned from a research conducted among the American Population whereby most considered ¼ as a bigger number than 1/3. Dismayed by the implications of this to the progress of the nation and the continued success of their business, they decided to invest heavily on ways to improve the numeracy of their future work force. And then I also remembered another piece of information about research carried out with disenfranchised boys that were considered illiterate in school and dropped out in large numbers as a result, but that could, nonetheless, perform serious math to carry out their work at the open market stalls where they worked. And then, upon viewing the “Branching Out” video, I could not stop wondering: what is it with numeracy that has to boi
Read more